Grab’s plan to shutter Uber’s app quickly following its
merger deal in Southeast Asia has hit another snag in Singapore 
This is the second
time that Grab has pushed back the removal of Uber’s app in Singapore, which
was initially scheduled for closure on April 8 but was given an additional week
as part of an investigation from the Competition and Consumer Commission of
Singapore (CCCS) which is assessing the merger deal. This new May 7 date is
also down to the CCCS probe, with the commission issuing an ‘Interim Measures
Directions’ (IMD) to Grab in order to “ensure that the market remains open
and contestable.”
Those directives —
which Grab said it has had a hand in formulating — include measures that
prevent Grab from taking Uber’s operational data on customers and their trip
history, prevent lock-in and exclusivity options for drivers that join
Grab or move over from Uber’s Lion City Rental entity, and end any exclusive
deals Grab has with Singapore taxi firms.
The CCCS has also
ruled that Grab and the Uber service must maintain prices for passengers and
drivers, and remind both that their migration to the Grab platform is optional.
The ruling impacts the
Singapore Southeast
 Asia , while the UberEats service will fold into GrabFood by the
end of May. Elsewhere, Uber’s ride-hailing service is scheduled to be
closed on April 16 in the Philippines 
where, like Singapore 
In both extensions,
Grab is the one footing the bill for the continued operation of Uber since the U.S. 
The CCCS previously
said that it has “reasonable grounds” to suspect that the Grab-Uber deal may
fall foul of section 54 of Singapore 
The Singapore ruling
is a blow for Grab which set out an aggressive two-week timeframe for closing
Uber in Southeast Asia, despite not contacting regulators in advance of
the deal which sees it pick up a dominant slice of app-based taxi books across
eight countries in Southeast Asia. The key question for regulators, however,
appears to be whether app-based hailing is a market unto itself, or whether it
is part of the wider taxi market.
If
regulators chose the former option, then Uber-Grab almost certainly creates a
monopoly, but since consumers can also hail apps in more traditional ways —
e.g. on the street — or via taxi companies’ dedicated apps — as is the case in
Singapore — then the deal hasn’t created a dominant player. It’s certainly a
tricky one to assess. Meanwhile, here is Grab’s statement on the Uber app extension
and the IMD:
We appreciate that
CCCS accepted our alternative interim measures. On CCCS’ request, we have
agreed to extend the Uber app to 7 May to allow for a smoother
transition time for riders and drivers. We trust that the CCCS’ review takes
into account a dynamic industry that is constantly evolving, highly
competitive, and being disrupted by technology and new services. The interim
measures should not have the unintended effect of hampering competition and
restricting businesses that have already been investing in the country over the
years.
Grab notes the CCCS’
objective of giving drivers choice, and is fully supportive of extending our
platform to all taxi drivers, including ComfortDelGro drivers who are still
constrained from picking up JustGrab jobs. Grab entered Singapore 
We’re proud to
headquarter in Singapore Singapore 





 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment